[MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 07:47:29 PST 2009
What original ideas have you had, Ron?
On 2 Dec 2009 at 7:23, X Acto wrote:
> Whose a environmentalist? I simply advocate using your own
> mind and not the repeating of others ideas.
> The problem is laziness..
> I advocate getting off your duff and quit bitchin
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 10:14:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Well said! Note how environmentalists plead for reasonableness while
> at the same time prominent climate scientists manipulate temperature
> data to support global warming and assure continuance of millions in
> climate-change funding.
>
> Platt
>
> On 1 Dec 2009 at 21:07, markhsmit wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Environmentalists v Capitalists? Hmm that is an interesting pair.
> > I suppose capitalists is used in a derogatory fashion by those
> > who went out and bought a computer to join in the forum.
> >
> > The problem that I have with some environmentalist is that they think
> > they know the Truth. They are righteous and believe everyone
> > should believe the way they do otherwise they are less than human.
> > In this way, they try to control things the way they think is right. I agree
> > with Platt, that sometimes it is nice to see that they are just as devious
> > and manipulative as the rest of the evil capitalists. It is this righteous
> > sense of morality that many environmentalists have that somehow
> > elevates them to a more religious level that is annoying. It is another
> > PC abuse.
> >
> > Capitalists try to live well as best they know. They are a little excessive
> > perhaps and their infatuation with wealth is a bit annoying as well, but to
> > each his own. I am not going to force anyone to be a capitalist or
> > a spiritualist, tell or force them how to live. We are not going to be allowed
> > to buy plasma TVs in California now because of somebody's opinion.
> > What is that all about? Oh, saving the planet, but from what, our desire to live
> > as we want to? Couldn't have that, we are so stupid.
> >
> > We can no more control the fate of the planet than we can live under
> > a dictatorship. It is all about control, not about concern. Best thing
> > that happened for environmentalism is the recession. The deeper
> > it goes, the more we save the planet. Best if the US just imploded.
> > Reasonable environmentalism? That is an oxymoron.
> >
> > IMHO
> >
> > Mark
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list