[MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost

plattholden at gmail.com plattholden at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 07:47:29 PST 2009


What original ideas have you had, Ron?


On 2 Dec 2009 at 7:23, X Acto wrote:

> Whose a environmentalist? I simply advocate using your own
> mind and not the repeating of others ideas.
> The problem is laziness..
> I advocate getting off your duff and quit bitchin
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 10:14:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Well said! Note how environmentalists plead for reasonableness while 
> at the same time prominent climate scientists manipulate temperature 
> data to support global warming and assure continuance of millions in 
> climate-change funding.    
> 
> Platt
> 
> On 1 Dec 2009 at 21:07, markhsmit wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Environmentalists v Capitalists?  Hmm that is an interesting pair.
> > I suppose capitalists is used in a derogatory fashion by those 
> > who went out and bought a computer to join in the forum.
> > 
> > The problem that I have with some environmentalist is that they think
> > they know the Truth.  They are righteous and believe everyone
> > should believe the way they do otherwise they are less than human.
> > In this way, they try to control things the way they think is right.  I agree
> > with Platt, that sometimes it is nice to see that they are just as devious
> > and manipulative as the rest of the evil capitalists.  It is this righteous
> > sense of morality that many environmentalists have that somehow
> > elevates them to a more religious level that is annoying.  It is another
> > PC abuse.
> > 
> > Capitalists try to live well as best they know.  They are a little excessive 
> > perhaps and their infatuation with wealth is a bit annoying as well, but to 
> > each his own.  I am not going to force anyone to be a capitalist or
> > a spiritualist, tell or force them how to live.  We are not going to be allowed
> > to buy plasma TVs in California now because of somebody's opinion.
> > What is that all about?  Oh, saving the planet, but from what, our desire to live
> > as we want to?  Couldn't have that, we are so stupid.
> > 
> > We can no more control the fate of the planet than we can live under
> >  a dictatorship.  It is all about control, not about concern.  Best thing
> > that happened for environmentalism is the recession.  The deeper
> > it goes, the more we save the planet.  Best if the US just imploded.
> > Reasonable environmentalism?  That is an oxymoron.
> > 
> > IMHO
> > 
> > Mark
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> 
> 
>       
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list