[MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost

[plattholden at gmail.com]

Are you pinning a rose on yourself? And what are you doing about 
anything? 

Still waiting for your original idea. 



On 2 Dec 2009 at 12:30, X Acto wrote:

> I advocate not blindly repeating others opinions without
> a bit of research and investigation,
> let us know too when to actually do something about
> what you're griping about so we may all likewise applaud you as well.
> 
> 
> 
> Platty want a cracker?
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 3:23:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
> 
> Not many. You advocated not repeating other's ideas. Glad to see most 
> of your ideas are also repeating other's, just like everyone else with the 
> possible exceptions of Plato, Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein and Adam 
> Smith. If you have an original idea, be sure to point it out so we can all 
> applaud.  
> 
> 
> On 2 Dec 2009 at 10:05, X Acto wrote:
> 
> > How many have you had Platt? count'em..
> > take off your socks if that helps
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
> > To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> > Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 12:19:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
> > 
> > Thanks. "Not many" That's what I thought.
> > 
> > 
> > On 2 Dec 2009 at 7:54, X Acto wrote:
> > 
> > > Not many but I research the ideas that have meaning to me
> > > and instead of bitching about them from my armchair
> > > on my fat ass I actually get up and do somthing
> > > about it.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
> > > To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> > > Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 10:47:29 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
> > > 
> > > What original ideas have you had, Ron?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 2 Dec 2009 at 7:23, X Acto wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Whose a environmentalist? I simply advocate using your own
> > > > mind and not the repeating of others ideas.
> > > > The problem is laziness..
> > > > I advocate getting off your duff and quit bitchin
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > > From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
> > > > To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> > > > Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 10:14:17 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Mark,
> > > > 
> > > > Well said! Note how environmentalists plead for reasonableness while 
> > > > at the same time prominent climate scientists manipulate temperature 
> > > > data to support global warming and assure continuance of millions in 
> > > > climate-change funding.    
> > > > 
> > > > Platt
> > > > 
> > > > On 1 Dec 2009 at 21:07, markhsmit wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Environmentalists v Capitalists?  Hmm that is an interesting pair.
> > > > > I suppose capitalists is used in a derogatory fashion by those 
> > > > > who went out and bought a computer to join in the forum.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The problem that I have with some environmentalist is that they think
> > > > > they know the Truth.  They are righteous and believe everyone
> > > > > should believe the way they do otherwise they are less than human.
> > > > > In this way, they try to control things the way they think is right.  I agree
> > > > > with Platt, that sometimes it is nice to see that they are just as devious
> > > > > and manipulative as the rest of the evil capitalists.  It is this righteous
> > > > > sense of morality that many environmentalists have that somehow
> > > > > elevates them to a more religious level that is annoying.  It is another
> > > > > PC abuse.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Capitalists try to live well as best they know.  They are a little excessive 
> > > > > perhaps and their infatuation with wealth is a bit annoying as well, but to 
> > > > > each his own.  I am not going to force anyone to be a capitalist or
> > > > > a spiritualist, tell or force them how to live.  We are not going to be allowed
> > > > > to buy plasma TVs in California now because of somebody's opinion.
> > > > > What is that all about?  Oh, saving the planet, but from what, our desire to live
> > > > > as we want to?  Couldn't have that, we are so stupid.
> > > > > 
> > > > > We can no more control the fate of the planet than we can live under
> > > > >  a dictatorship.  It is all about control, not about concern.  Best thing
> > > > > that happened for environmentalism is the recession.  The deeper
> > > > > it goes, the more we save the planet.  Best if the US just imploded.
> > > > > Reasonable environmentalism?  That is an oxymoron.
> > > > > 
> > > > > IMHO
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mark
> > > > 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> 
> 
>       
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/