[MD] MOQ's "to be or not to be"

[craigerb at comcast.net]

[Marsha] 
> Only from the subject/object perspective are there objects (things-in-themeselves), 
>  from the MoQ perspective there are only patterns within all levels. 
>  For me, that means patterns, from whatever level, 
>  applied to the undifferentiated continuum (DQ). 


Marsha, 

I guess we mean different things by "object".  For me an object is less fundamental. 
Some see an object as fundamentally a thing-in-itself, as a pattern or as an illusion. 
Craig