[MD] MOQ's "to be or not to be"

[Marsha Valkyr]

On Dec 16, 2009, at 2:33 PM, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:

> 
> 
> [Marsha] 
>>  Only from the subject/object perspective are there objects (things-in-themeselves), 
>>  from the MoQ perspective there are only patterns within all levels. 
>>   For me, that means patterns, from whatever level, 
>>   applied to the undifferentiated continuum (DQ). 
> 
> Craig:
> I guess we mean different things by "object".  For me an object is less fundamental. 
> Some see an object as fundamentally a thing-in-itself, as a pattern or as an illusion.   


Craig,
 
It must be epistemological relativity...     I do not understand 'patterns' as simply a synonym for 'objects'.  

 
Marsha