[MD] MOQ's "to be or not to be"

[X Acto]

Mister Skutvik
Dec 11.  

you had said:
> > If the human brain (I guess you mean the human mind)  has created 
> > SOM (the mind/matter metaphysics) then it has created the MOQ as 
> > well, and we have a "human brain metaphysics". Oh shit you will not even
> > understand the irony, forget it. I spoke to John about the MOQ requiring
> > centuries for people beginning to understand ...  see you in "2209. 

Ron:
> I think thats a little too optimistic....how can you expect humans to
> evolve to such an advanced level as yourself in such a short time?
> genius must be soo lonely. poor Bodvar 

Master Skutvik replies in standard method:
I'm a most mediocre person who don't dare take intelligence tests for 
fear of being exposed as a moron. Attempts at self-mocking aside. I 
wonder what made me an "antenna" for the Quality Idea, and what it 
is that blocks your reception?.

Ron:
Ohh boy, and after all our conversations,..just tired of replying to this statement
Bo, antenna...I mean realllly.

Bo:
There have been those who are 
sympathetic towards me personally, Platt primarily, but  the closest he 
has come is of the MOQ as both an intellectual pattern and 
something "dynamic" beyond, which is not right -IMO - the MOQ has 
intellect as a subset and can't be a subset of its own subset without 
violating the container logic. 

Ron:
That is what happens when one insists on equating the intellectual level
with SOM in a strict hierarchal sense. You simply do not understand the
consequences of your formulation.

Bo:
Besides, the MOQ is the MOQ and 
neither dynamic nor static, but a new existential level.

Ron:
A new existential level, I sense huge consequences  with this meaning.
then again I'm unsure as to the meaning you give this statement.
I would be nice if you would elaborate on this idea.

Bo:
 There there 
has been a succession of people who - possibly - found my posts 
"impressive",  yourself among those, but all have proved "duds" ... 
except Mati Palm-Leis that is. Andre the one who most persistently 
have tried to understand, but the intellectual level as SOM and SOM 
alone is his stumbling stone as it has been to so many, but is the 
MOQ's "to be or not to be".

Ron:
Quite mellow dramatic, in typical style, 

I say,  quite confidently, not to be.

The theory of meaning is about all that is reasonably practicle
with the term theory being emphasized   
Bodvar it's the development of theory which holds the power
how theory is developed..the science of meaning, something you just seemed to
have steam rolled right over ...

 









Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/