[MD] The MOQ and religions.

[Mary Clark]

Hi Bodvar,

[I said to you}
>  ....... but consider this The Intellectual Level would not exist
>  were it not for Monotheism.

[Then you responded]
Coming down from the "mountain". The intellectual level would not
exist without the social , but IMO monotheism was not the dynamic
social pattern that "took off on a purpose of its own" to form
intellect, rather a deadlock.

[So now I respond]
You are too kind.  Is it the memory of long past discussions?  For whatever
reason it is nice of you to cut me such slack.

I need to get to the rereading, for I am mired in an inability to
distinguish the defining moment separating the Social from the
Intellectual.  Why this is so important to me I do not know.

I reread some of Daddy's posts last night. What I see is his struggle to
integrate DQ with the universe with a capital U.  He was always a bigger
thinker than me.  He spent his time trying to construct a unified field
theory of the MoQ, while I struggle along just trying to figure out how to
get through the day.  The only thing I'm sure of is that the older I get the
less I know. :)

Is there much speculation about a 5th level?  I tend to focus on the static
levels because they seem to hold more meaning for me than pondering the
great unknowable DQ.  The idea of a 5th level and what it might be intrigues
me.  Based on your recent posts, perhaps you see it as a melding of the
mystical with the practical, as in your hope for a blending of Christian
spirituality with science - or have I misunderstood?

It's all good,
Mary