[MD] Theism/epistemology

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Sat Feb 7 06:01:32 PST 2009


At 08:46 AM 2/7/2009, you wrote:
>Hi Marsha,
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > A reminder:
> >
> > "The MOQ is an atheistic religious outlook that solves rather than
> > bypasses religious problems."
> >
> > "The selling out of intellectual truth to the social icons of
> > organized religion is seen by the MOQ as an evil act."
> >
> > "The MOQ would add a fourth stage where the term "God" is completely
> > dropped as a relic of an evil social suppression of intellectual and
> > Dynamic freedom.   The MOQ is not just atheistic in this regard.  It
> > is anti-theistic. "
> >
> >      (RMP, Copleston)
>
>On the other hand:
>
>"Finally, though it may be argued that a metaphysics that incorporates a
>central term that isn't defined (i.e. Dynamic Quality) isn't a real
>metaphysics, it can also be argued that the strength of the MOQ is its
>ability to incorporate the indeterminate divine within a coherent and
>logical paradigm."
>
>Letter to Bodvar Skutvik
> >From Robert M Pirsig, September 15, 2000

Hi Platt,

I don't understand what you are getting at.  Does that make selling 
out an intellectual truth to the social icons of organized religion 
greater than an evil act?


Marsha



_____________

QUESTION EVERYTHING!!!

    




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list