[MD] Theism/epistemology

[MarshaV]

At 04:06 PM 2/7/2009, you wrote:
> > At 03:27 PM 2/7/2009, you wrote:
> > >[MP]
> > > > While MoQ'ers may believe that MoQ has no place for God, god or even
> > g*d,
> > > > it
> > > > is not a very practical means of evolution even if infallible. The
> > first
> > > > human to
> > > > have the intellectual DQ spark that led to society would not have
> > been
> > > > worth her
> > > > weight in salt had she refused to work with those who hadn't yet had
> > such
> > > > a
> > > > spark. I'd wager she interacted with them in ways that led them to
> > > > innately
> > > > recognize the worth of her DQ event rather than present them with a
> > "my
> > > > way or
> > > > the highway" ultimatum.
> > >
> > >Good point. Such ultimatums also come from those who claim there is
> > only
> > >one right way to think.
> > >
> > >Platt
> >
> > Platt,
> >
> > Just for the record there are as many ways to think as there are
> > individual collections of of interrelated and interconnected,
> > inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, static patterns of
> > value responding to Dynamic Quality.  But this collection does not
> > accept God, g*d, theism, or th*ism.  And if Micheal cannot accept
> > that, I will not waste his time or bother him.
> >
> >
> > Marsha
>
>Marsha:
>
>I have no argument that you individual collection does not accept what
>Michael's individual collection is saying. But my individual collection
>believes he is onto something important about the MOQ whose highest value
>is not static certainty but Dynamic openness.


Platt,

Okay.  I understand.


Marsha



_____________

QUESTION EVERYTHING!!!