[MD] Genesis
skutvik at online.no
skutvik at online.no
Tue Feb 10 09:15:47 PST 2009
Hi Platt
A few days ago you agreed with my comment about science as a
new "myth", I replied but it looks as if my post didn't make it into
cyberspace. And for some reason I can't find my copy, nor your
post, but I'll try to recount it.
What I replied was that I did not not quite like what I had invited to.
Science as a new myth is what the New Age people use to debunk
it. What I had meant was that all static levels are incomplete for
the very reason of being static, i.e; just one half of the complete
DQ/SQ reality and will start showing paradoxes if examined
closely, intellect's science no different.
So at first your agreement looked too enthusiastic (what a strange
complaint ;-) but the more I studied it the more it looked as you
had understood it just the way it was meant. Perhaps you (like me)
alternate between regarding intellect and science as the block to
understanding the MOQ and the next moment defending it
vehemently as the highest static good ... which it notoriously is.
IMO
Bo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list