[MD] Theism/epistemology
Platt Holden
plattholden at gmail.com
Sun Feb 22 09:40:16 PST 2009
Hey MP:
> Admittedly, I am pushing the definition
> of
> theism to an edge, and then from there seeking to extend past the edge.
> But
> even at the edge, the word takes on far greater quality meaning than mere
> "religion" has manage so far absent an MoQ approach to "theism."
Agree. It seems passing strange to me that those who are perfectly willing
to accept Pirsig's extension of "morality" past the edge of common meaning
so that it takes on a far greater quality meaning are statically dead set
against any similar extension of "theism" as you have been proposing. All
great leaps forward in mankind's drive towards betterness have been taken
by individuals seeking Quality who freed something from its static box.
> Reading ZAMM & Lila was to me a little like finally understanding the
> electromagnetic wave equation. It was a sudden realization that in all
> that
> complexity there is a simple sense to it all, and what's more, that such
> "sense"
> more than likely extends beyond mere electromagnetism to the other forces,
> but, having not even a fraction of the intellect it would take to grasp
> it, needing
> to settle with just "a hunch." I'm at that point with Quality; I have to
> go with "a
> hunch" about how it relates them all because I don't believe I can manage
> to
> express, to "mechanize" (credit to David Swift) it in to knowledge.
>
> The road-block is trying to explain the inexplicable. It is in attempting
> to put into
> words, here to you all, (and then in *MoQ* terms,) what I comprehend
> viscerally
> with far greater clarity.
Precisely so. The road-block you describe is exactly the same as the road-
block encountered in trying to explain beauty. As James Hillman observed,"A
major part of the repression of beauty has always been an inability to find
for it a rational definition." Little wonder that academic philosphers have
largely ignored the MOQ, and why, like beauty, one's understanding of the
MOQ is fundamentally aesthetic.
Regards,
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list