[MD] The Quality/MOQ dichotomy

[MarshaV]

Hello David,

Sorry to interrupt, but your question struck me as curious.  What is 
name and definition?


Marsha



At 08:58 PM 2/23/2009, you wrote:
>
>
>David:
>
>
>
>I propose a new subject line: Quality a definition.
>
>
>
>Andre:
>
>
>
>Hi David, by all means start a new subject line but please do not define
>Quality! or even look for one...there isn't any.
>
>Even Pirsig has already gone too far by suggesting the term Quality for what
>he is referring to...and he has been very clear about this.
>
>
>
>Unless you mean something else entirely??
>
>
>
>Andre
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi back at you Andre.
>
>I can't imagine a philosopher who refuses to consider any philosophical
>question. If we can't define Quality, there must be a reason. Have you guys
>already discussed this to death? Can you give me some dates in the archives?
>
>
>You imply that the "term Quality" means something other than Quality. Where
>was RMP "very clear about this"?
>
>That said, what I mean by Quality must be something very different from what
>you mean.
>
>Being new here I naturally want to start at definitions, can you help with
>references or explanations? -david swift
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.