[MD] Multiculturalism scam

[Platt Holden]

> Therefore, Platt, If I may be so bold as to suggest re-focusing your
> bias
> in such a manner as to look at those cultures which value intellectual
> dynamism as having morally superiority over those that do not. 

Exactly so. I assume your bias is also thus focused?.
Platt


> ________________________________
> From: X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2009 9:07:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] Multiculturalism scam
> 
> 
> 
> Make no mistake, religeon and science are
> competing forms of intellectual patterns.
> The struggle is between older static patterns
> and newer more dynamic patterns.
> 
> Now if you want to say that the more dynamic
> intellectual patterns are the ones that are moraly
> superior to those intellectual patterns which are
> more static, then you have a more reliable
> assessment of the situation.  
> -ron
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------
> 
> I challenged you to have a look at this LILA quote
> 
>     "But what the larger intellectual structure of the  Metaphysics of 
>     Quality makes clear is that this political battle of science to free
>     itself from domination by social moral codes was in fact a 
>     moral battle! It was the battle of a higher, intellectual level of 
>     evolution to keep itself from being devoured by a lower, social 
>     level of evolution." (Lila, 24)  
> 
> Science is SOM, that much we agree on? And if science tries to free 
> itself from social (level) domination it must be intellect's foremost 
> value. In fact Pirsig just says it here, it's intellect's cause. If this
> isn't 
> SOL what is?
> 
> Bo