[MD] Quick one: causation

[Platt Holden]

> > > [Chris] 
> > > Allright, answer me this, just quickly - why can't the explanation of
> a
> > > performed action
> > > by an individual be explained only in terms of physical causation?
> > 
> > [Platt]
> > "There is always this open end of Dynamic indeterminacy." (Lila, 11)
> > 
> > [Krimel]
> > So what you and Pirsig are saying here is, "Ooops"?
> 
> [Platt]
> "Ooops" means evolutionary changes occur without purpose. "Dynamic 
> indeterminacy" means evolutionary changes occur in response to something
> better, i.e., towards the "fittest."
> 
> The difference is well spelled out in Chapter 11 of Lila which we all know
> you summarily reject.    
> 
> [Krimel]
> The word is 'indeterminacy". Look it up. It means that for better or for
> worse the outcome can not be determined.

Look up the word "Dynamic" in Lila. It means good. 

> But yes, Chapter 11 is so full of misconceptions that it is should be
> embarrassing to anyone who wants to take the MoQ serious.

Obviously you don't take the MOQ seriously.