[MD] Quick one: causation

[MarshaV]

Thank you Krimel.

My meaning is that a thing does not inherently exist.  A thing exist 
based on convention.

Marsha


At 08:06 PM 1/18/2009, you wrote:
> >[Krimel]
> >This is a big stumbling block. Marsha for example keeps repeating the manta
> >that it is all just conceptual patterns devoid of "reality;" just the
> >shifting of points of view; illusion, maya. It is not just that the TiTs
> >are unknowable in their fullness but that they have no "existence" in any
> > sense of the term "existence."
>
>- Marsha
>Wrong, wrong, wrong.   Marsha says that patterns are devoid of
>inherent existence.
>
>And what they refer to lacks inherent existence.
>
>[Krimel]
>I stand corrected:
>
>This is a big stumbling block. Marsha for example keeps repeating the manta
>that it is all just conceptual patterns devoid of inherent existence, just
>the shifting of points of view; illusion, maya. It is not just that the TiTs
>are unknowable in their fullness but that they have no "inherent existence"
>in any sense."
>
>
>
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a 
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.