[MD] Quick one: causation
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Mon Jan 19 01:16:30 PST 2009
At 11:19 PM 1/18/2009, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>My meaning is that a thing does not inherently exist. A thing exist
>based on convention.
>
>[Krimel]
>So what does "exist" or have inherent existence?
>
Krimel,
No thing inherently exists. No thing exists from its own
side. There is no thing-in-itself. No thing has its own essence or
nature, etc.
Entities exist by convention and are best represented as patterns,
ever-changing, interrelated, mutually dependent static patterns of value,
Marsha
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list