[MD] Quick one: causation
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Mon Jan 19 10:30:01 PST 2009
At 10:00 AM 1/19/2009, you wrote:
> >[Marsha]
> >My meaning is that a thing does not inherently exist. A thing exist
> >based on convention.
> >
> >[Krimel]
> >So what does "exist" or have inherent existence?
>
>[Marsha]
>No thing inherently exists. No thing exists from its own
>side. There is no thing-in-itself. No thing has its own essence or
>nature, etc.
>
>Entities exist by convention and are best represented as patterns,
>ever-changing, interrelated, mutually dependent static patterns of value,
>
>[Krimel]
>So for you, unless the cheese stands alone its existence is insignificant?
No, spovs are not insignificant, but they are also not TiTs.
Marsha
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list