[MD] Kant and the MOQ

[MarshaV]

At 01:23 PM 1/19/2009, you wrote:

>[Krimel]
>The Tao te Ching does not talk about level. For that matter it does not talk
>about active and passive as fundamental either. It says that any phenomena
>can be understood as the union of opposites. That is the analytic knife that
>Pirsig is using.

The Tao that can be told
is not the eternal Tao.





.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a 
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.