[MD] FW: Kant and the MOQ

[Krimel]

> Krimel said:
> Energy is dynamic is fields of force moving and flowing fluidlike. Matter
is static, it is fields of energy compacted into stasis.
>
> dmb says:
> Well, that description certainly makes sense but in the context of the MOQ
it is deeply confused.

[Ian]
Actually I would have said the opposite DMB but end up agreeing with
your point. Seeing matter as "static" is just sloppy / confused common
sense short-hand, the reality of any model, physics or the MoQ, is
that .... the "matter" is just one of the more stable (static)
patterns in things, as you say.

The MoQ IS sense ... better sense than much recieved widom of
so-called common sense language.

[Krimel]
I am familiar with the Matter Myth. But I didn't think the discussion with
dmb had reached that level of sophistication. If it had, I would have used
it to place more emphasis on what I consider to be the fact that, in the
real world stasis can not be completely removed from the dynamic and the
dynamic can not be removed from the static.