[MD] Wanted: A proper foundation

[MarshaV]

At 04:55 AM 1/29/2009, Bo wrote:

> > Marsha said:
> > I am concerned that the patterns are seen as independent (inherently
> > existing) entities, just a new name for objects. This I think is the
> > wrong view. RMP has stated that there are no thing-in-themselves in
> > the MOQ, and he has mentioned Buddhism and emptiness, though he has
> > not stated my interpretation directly. Bo replied: ...all patterns are
> > static quality and in the Q context they are independent and exists
> > very much in themselves.
>
>[Bo:]
>I have spoken to Marsha before, she will possibly understand that
>it's the Quality/Concept fallacy that creates the puzzle .


Greetings Bo,

I have no way of understanding this comment.  I do not understand you 
puzzlement or the Quality/Concept fallacy.

Patterns are empty of inherent existence.  I do not see a paradox. 
puzzlement or contradiction in this statement.  And I await an 
explanation to my 09:45 AM 1/28/2009 post.


Marsha






_____________

Disclaimer:  To quote Sgt. Schultz from Stalag 13,  "I know nothing!"