[MD] new blog

[Andre Broersen]

Mel says:

They almost all admit the superstitions are silly, but they won't
play without them.  So, on that model, 'false cause' beliefs are not
the cause of behavior (strikes or homeruns), but rather the
specific choices made in ACTION are.

Andre:
Hi Mel, I tend to lean towards dmb's response. Isn't the action, regardles
of performer, the expression of all relevant level spov's getting together
in one harmonious unity? And Quality being the 'motivating' and
 'expressive' factor, the interpretation of which depends upon one's
analogues?
Not sure what true or false cause have to do with this.

Of course they'll admit it is silly..they would look silly not to admit this
but this is because superstition has a rather negative connotation.

Suppose I go for a job interview tomorrow. I'll put some neat clothes and
shoes on. This will make my appearance more acceptable, improve my chances
on getting the job, raising my confidence and thus ensuring that my
performance has quality. (these are all superstitions)
During the interview (the performance) I know and feel confident (and
sometimes remind myself) that I have done everything within my power to make
this a quality performance and I exude this.

I am not convinced that the action can be separated from the belief as
definately as you suggest.
For what it's worth.
Andre