[MD] new blog

[X Acto]

MP,
I think this is where you are getting your friction, the constructive response to
theism. We all differ on this, while some deem the best way to meet this is 
head on, others tend to favor moving with and guiding. A personal preference
to be sure, with arguments supporting both sides.
There really is no Moq doctrine, such the beauty of it. Your the captain of
your own ship, MoQ simply provides a star to steer by.

-Ron




________________________________
From: Michael Poloukhine <moq at poloukhine.com>
To: moq_discuss at lists.moqtalk.org
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 3:43:40 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] new blog

> From: MarshaV
> 208 "The MOQ would add a fourth stage where the term "God" is 
> completely dropped as a relic of an evil social suppression of 
> intellectual and Dynamic freedom. The MOQ is not just atheistic in
> this regard. It is anti-theistic."

MP: Thanks for those, Marsha.

The one that I think most caught my eye was the one above. The question I 
think that needs to be asked of adherents of MoQ is: Does the MoQ's anti-
theistic nature demand anti-theistic responses to theism in seeking Quality in a 
theistic world? Is anti-theism the way to covercome theism in an MoQ approach 
just because the MoQ is itself anti-theistic?

My current feeling is no; it does not demand it, and in fact IMO (see my last post 
about superstion in baseball) anti-theism in a theistic context is anti-quality in 
from an MoQ POV.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/