[MD] new blog

[Andre Broersen]

Hey Andre,
I think Michael is approaching this pragmatically, the question being
"is theism usefull in a Quality way?"??? sure, but it also perpetuates
objectivism (SOM) which is the downside which ultimately will
interfere with a quality understanding of what MoQ proposes.
In effect when it comes right down to the major abstract concepts
and their understanding, the two will conflict. This is what needs
to be expressed to him..
Utimately essentialism is the problem.
- Ron

Hi Ron, Platt, MP and All,

Yes, perhaps I was bit harsh on MP and Ishould appreciate the good
intentions. Of course every pattern is allowed to be free to believe in what
he/she likes but, on this Discuss, to even suggest a hint at 'Quality'
having some theistic connotations does not help.
If Mp's God has quality, fine, but I'd rather frame it as Quality having his
God.

For what it's worth.
Andre