[MD] Reductionism

[david buchanan]

Ron:
At the risk of spoiling the positive, constructive turn recently taken here, I think the wiki article on radical empiricism that you quoted recently was extremely destructive. It was a direct hit and shattered Krimel's case into tiny pieces or whirling particles. And what could be more relevant? I think that's what drained the snarky snark out of him and when things starting getting constructive. I could almost hear him thinking, "Hmmm. Maybe dmb isn't an idiot after all". 
So thank you.


> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:26:03 -0700
> From: xacto at rocketmail.com
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] Reductionism
> 
> Dave, Krimel,
> I like that this discussion has took a turn
> toward getting to the bottom of the dispute in a meaningful way, I have learned
> quite a bit from turning it around at different angles and the conflict is definitly
> one that holds a relevency in current understanding, I know it can't all be hugs
> an kisses but I really learn alot from you two when you go at it constructivly,
> thanks for including me.
> -Ron
> 
> 
>       
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

_________________________________________________________________
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290