[MD] Reductionism
skutvik at online.no
skutvik at online.no
Sun Jul 5 08:10:56 PDT 2009
Hi Platt
You said (to me)
> To put it simply as I understand it: The terms static and Dynamic
> Quality are intellectual, but that to which DQ refers to is not. Thus,
> the reality pointed to by the MOQ cannot be defined, but you know it
> anyway.
Thanks for the interest in this issue which is the heart of the matter
(as I say in to-day's post to DMB) and I hope you forgive my
professoral tone. The terms "static", "dynamic" and "quality" are
neither intellectual or anti-intellectual, they are words of the English
language (all languages have the same terms I guess, but that
doesn't matter) The term "intellectual" means the ability of
distinguishing between what's objective from what's subjective (as my
dictionary says) which is also the correct definition of the 4th. level's
value - not IDEAS or THOUGHTS as most of the discussion seem to
think.
Now, the notion of language as a subjective reflection of objective
phenomena is a form of intellect's S/O-repertoire and it screws the
MOQ up to say that DQ is ineffable because it is something words
refer to - a concept. This reality/concept split is intellect's value and if
this is made into a variant of the DQ/SQ - as DMB says - it means
that MOQ becomes a subsidiary of SOM. DQ's first static fallout is the
inorganic level and words, concepts ..etc. does not come into play
until the social level and language, but even here the reality/concept
discrepancy is not recognized. It came to be with the intellectual level
- with SOM.
Finally, the MOQ postulates a DQ/SQ split and says that the dynamic
part is indefinable. What's wrong with that? Is it "defined" just by
saying so in words? So why had Pirsig to postulate a Quality/Concept
meta-metaphysics on top of that? Long ago we all agreed on this only
leading to an infinite regress because this meta-metaphysics is also
expressed in words and needs another meta-meta-meta ....and so on
ad infinity.
Belated congratulations with the 4th of July!
Bodvar
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list