[MD] Reductionism
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Mon Jul 6 01:05:16 PDT 2009
At 04:46 PM 7/5/2009, you wrote:
>[Krimel]
>The point I have been making is that emotions are our sense of Value.
>Rationalizations and logic are not sufficient to generate commitment. What
>distinguishes scientists and mystics is first methodology and second
>standards of verification. Scientists much submit their views to collective
>agreement. Mystic live in their own little worlds.
Marsha:
This point-of-view may be true for you, it might be your 'reality',
but because you state it doesn't make it so for others. Your defense
of science is a social level interpretation, and I do not buy what
your selling. You never did explain your definition of 'emotions'
when I asked, and I was afraid you would use the term just so you
could point to your favorite brain chemical: Oxytocin, and that is
just what you did. Your statements about the mystic are dismissive;
it seems the subject obviously doesn't interest you even though it an
important part of RMP's books. And your arguments, in general, are
becoming weak and vindictive. As far as I can understand it, no one
wants to dismiss science, but put it in a secondary place to a
broader MoQ understanding. Why are you not happy with that?
"Compassion diminishes fright about your own pain and increases inner
strength." ~His Holiness, the Dalai Lama
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list