[MD] ***a new begining***

[X Acto]

David Buchanan really put his finger on it when he clarified, with adequate support
and several examples of why the MoQ's intellectual level is a MORAL level. I may
even go as far as to say it is THE moral level given that MoQ is a static intellectual
pattern that posits that intellectual values are moral values and the source of all
static pattens.
I exercised it last evening, and it worked in every scenario. Case study after
case study it explained the struggle and the reasons for them. Where it got weird
was in the explanation of the inorganic and the organic patterns of value which
were formally explained by scientific objectivism and, within that context, made
up all of reality, which excluded social and intellectual patterns of value. Verifying
the Pragmatic usage of the explanation on these levels of value proved more
difficult for a laymen such as myself. I could see that Quantum physics,
Einsteins relativity theories, Bohr complementarity, set theory and the like,
coincided and rested comfortably with it, this included the historical perspective
while the intellectual values covered the empirical epistemological view.

In other words all was explained, accurately. No double meaning and contradictions.
no two types of MoQ DQ they were specified by where they fell in the levels of 
explanation.


I got excited, seemed like the model was out of the box, put together correctly
and worked like the intructions said it would work. The test ride proved it to me.
It  performed flawlessly.