[MD] Another parallel

[X Acto]

Platt,
That first part was aimed at Bo,
But I ask, in reference to my questions to you, is how then , is MoQ
expected to make any difference? How is it to give value to a value-less
intellectual pattern?
I really have a hard time understanding how you can equate MoQ with anti-intellectualism.

-Ron



 



________________________________
From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:16:25 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Another parallel

On 14 Jul 2009 at 6:33, X Acto wrote:

> These statements are meaningless and exhibit a social level
> value of ignorance in the wake of saving face. Like the social level
> values of the religios figures you so like to compare yourself to, the
> dogmatic blind faith to your own ideals is staggering.

I express an opinion and you launch a personal attack. What's with that? 
And what religious figures do I like to compare myself to? 

> Platt, 
> Anthony is an "Academic" does this place him with SOM also?
> Does this invalidate everything he has to say about the MoQ?
> 
> If not why not?  was the liverpool conference a sham in your eyes? 

Sure. Anthony is with SOM. So are you. So am I. Whatever anyone 
says about the MOQ is SOM tainted.  But, "getting drunk and picking up 
bar-ladies and writing metaphysics is a part of life." (Lila, 5)

I'm sure the liverpool conference was great for the participants, 
especially having the privilege of meeting Pirsig in person. I wish I could 
have been there. But as for the value of the papers presented there, 
well, for me not much. 

Platt
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/