[MD] Another parallel

[plattholden at gmail.com]

On 14 Jul 2009 at 9:47, X Acto wrote:

> Platt:
> Do you have a hard time understanding this from Pirsig?
> 
> "Remember that the central reality of the MOQ is not an object or a 
> subject or anything else. It is understood by direct experience only
> and not by reasoning of any kind." 
> 
> Ron:
> The only understanding I may gleen from this statement in reference to my question
> is that the MoQ in your opinion is not teachable or explainable in any way.
> 
> How did you come by it? certainly, as the above quote proves, it certainly IS
> explainable he just explained it.
> Why, if a professor does the same thing in a classroom is it wrong?
> 
> that makes anything you say about MoQ wrong. so that even your quotes 
> and your statements about MoQ are also academic and wrong.
> 
> I just do not understand this rational Platt.
 
Not wrong, Ron. Inadequate. 

But while all explanations of the MOQ are inadequate, many are also 
wrong, especially those from SOM brainwashed critics. 

Platt