[MD] Philosophy and Philosophology

[Ian Glendinning]

Hi John, I was just being ironic ... up to that point there were only
you and Matt in the thread.
Matt didn't pick up on my point anyway.
Ian

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:29 PM, John Carl<ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
> There are such things as "private conversations" on a public forum?
> Geez, I gotta get that protocol manual.  As far as I'm concerned, speak when
> DQ moves, don't speak when DQ doesn't.
>
>
> John the butt-in-er and jumper of threads and whatever else chaotically
> occurs in the moment
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Ian Glendinning <ian.glendinning at gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> Is this a pivate conversation Matt & John ?
>>
>> I wanted to butt-in earlier on philoso-phology and my own
>> non-pejorative use of the term. Also to relate the philo-philosophy to
>> Matt's earlier post on meta-philosophy. Not being about "winning"
>> arguments, but about recognizing (and moving on to) the right
>> arguments.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ian
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:08 AM, John Carl<ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > John said:
>> > There's another good example of the difference between philosophy and
>> > philosophology.
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>