[MD] Think like a baby
X Acto
xacto at rocketmail.com
Wed Jun 3 07:12:55 PDT 2009
> Platt,
> To view things as a baby and how Pirsig mentions, is to drop the stereotypes
> we hold and take a fresh new look. Like looking at the positives of socialism
> communism and capitalism and combine them to create a society that actually
> DOES value the individual, valuing individuals other than YOURSELF is
> socialism you know.
Platt:
What are the positives of socialism and communism? Is making other
individuals dependent on government for their welfare your idea of
"valuing" them?
Ron:
No, and thats not the goal of either nor is it of capitalism. the Goal of all is the
individual dedication to social Quality.
Ron prev:
> That is why I have a hard time understanding your dichotomy
> of value of the individual in society yet despise anything that has to do with it
> . You exalt the diversity of individuals yet despise multiculturalism
> when what you really despise is moral relativism,
Platt:
Just in case you've forgotten, here's what Pirsig had to say about
multiculturism which demands we value all cultures equally:
"Cultures can be graded and judged morally according to their
contribution to the evolution of life." (Lila, 24)
Ron:
In case you have forgotten that is cultual relativism NOT multicultualism.
And Pirsig makes my point.
Ron prev:
> Pirsig gives us
> a way to make moral judgments without the typical stereotypes
> that hinder us from making Quality judgments or the paralysis
> of relativism.
Platt:
Agree.
Ron:
Then whats with all the fuss about multiculturalism?
Ron prev:
> I'll save you the effort of the
> Lila quote.
>
> In the veldt it's the individual that gets eaten first. United we stand, divided we fall.
> Safety in numbers.
Platt:
In what chapter in Lila will I find that quote?
Ron:
The quote refers to the one you made previously above the one you appearently
agree with, please follow along.
Ron prev:
> The idea is to look at the Quality in everything Platt, this is what babies do.
Platt:
Right. But Quality has a negative side, too. That's why among a baby's
first words is, "No!".
Ron:
I agree Quality does have a negative side also expereinced without stereotypes by babies,
Been awhile since you held a baby, toddlers say "no" because we teach them the word "no".
during the terrible 2's they really exercise it.
________________________________
From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 9:56:24 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Think like a baby
On 3 Jun 2009 at 6:29, X Acto wrote:
> ________________________________
> From: "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 7:49:34 AM
> Subject: [MD] Think like a baby
>
> All:
>
> There's a book out called "The Philosophical Baby." The Boston Globe
> has an interesting review at:
>
> http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/04/26/inside_the
> _baby_mind/?page=full
>
> If you read it I think you'll be reminded of Pirsig's thoughts about the
> world as seen by babies in Chapter 9 of Lila. Perhaps you'll recall these
> words:
>
> "This, Phaedrus thought, was why little children are usually quicker to
> perceive Dynamic Quality than old people, why beginners are usually
> quicker than experts, why primitive people are sometimes quicker than
> those of "advanced" cultures."
>
> To perceive DQ -- isn't that our goal? The article suggests how we just
> might be able to do that more often.
>
> Regards,
> Platt
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list