[MD] NAP

ARLO J BENSINGER JR ajb102 at psu.edu
Sun Jun 7 11:11:27 PDT 2009


[Nick]
A civil society can agree upon such parks and limits of kills.  It doesn't need
a monopoly government to have this happen.  

[Arlo]
Who would enforce what this civil society agrees upon? How would it pay for
such enforcement?

[Nick]
Again non-sequitur, nobody said that would happen, so, you're off topic.

[Arlo]
Not at all. I said the government, in symbiosis, provides roads. You said the
"free market" could provides better. Hence private ownership of roads, how do
you think the property owner will recoup the expense of building a road on his
land? Tolls.

If not, then explain to me how the "free market" could provide a better roadway
infrastructure than the evil coercive government.







More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list