[MD] NAP

[blue-jay maple]

> [Nick previously]
> A civil society can agree upon such parks and limits of kills.  It 
> doesn't need
> a monopoly government to have this happen.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Who would enforce what this civil society agrees upon? How would it pay for
> such enforcement?

The law with individuals to back them up with enforce it.  Voluntary pay by those 
that want the park, not forced taxes.

 
> [Nick previously]
> Again non-sequitur, nobody said that would happen, so, you're off topic.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Not at all. I said the government, in symbiosis, provides roads. You said the
> "free market" could provides better. Hence private ownership of roads, how do
> you think the property owner will recoup the expense of building a road on his
> land? Tolls.

Nick:
Of course tolls, but that doesn't mean you'll be paying a toll every minute.  There would 
be no demand for that realistically.  So you're off-topic and being emotive, irrational.

Arlo:
> If not, then explain to me how the "free market" could provide a 
> better roadway infrastructure than the evil coercive government.

Nick:
Most roads now are made by private companies that are contracted out.  Nobody 
forces people to make roads.  The government is the coercive middle-man not doing 
the actual roadwork.

Nick


-- 
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com