[MD] NAP
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Mon Jun 8 06:15:01 PDT 2009
At 08:55 AM 6/8/2009, you wrote:
>Nick:
>It's the best possible way that I know of to
>minimize conflict. Since we are social animals,
>this principle conflates with natural law and therefore
>the natural rights of liberty, life (person), and property.
>It is an age old knowledge (just saying this so you know
>I'm not making this up) that natural rights are moral values.
>Yet not all moral values are natural rights. Natural rights
>are universal and are therefore moral values that are
>natural law. Where are all the moral values and including
>those that conflate into natural rights originating? In the
>pursuit of happiness. When the greek word for this concept
>is understood (cause that's where it comes from), happiness
>means flourishing, quality, well-being. Do you see what
>I mean now? Quality is all about minimizing conflict in
>order that all flourishes, and thus for human nature to flourish
>as well. It is meant in this way:
>
>flourish
>verb
>1 ferns flourish in the shade grow, thrive, prosper, do well,
>burgeon, increase, multiply, proliferate; spring up, shoot up,
>bloom, blossom, bear fruit, burst forth, run riot. antonym die, wither.
>2 the arts flourished thrive, prosper, bloom, be in good health, be
>vigorous, be in its heyday; progress, make progress, advance, make
>headway, develop, improve; evolve, make strides, move forward (in
>leaps and bounds), expand; informal be in the pink, go places, go
>great guns, get somewhere. antonym decline.
>
>This dictionary mentions ferns and arts. But flourish includes
>everything. Thus it means for society, individuals, life to thrive,
>prosper, be of good quality.
>
>The telos in flourishing is of good. Humans telos what is
>good. That's what flourishing is about. I have a paper by a
>professor that discusses this. I'm actually in a conversation with
>the professor now about quality and the pursuit of
>happiness. People haven't seen this side of what quality means and
>how it fits. I've been able to resolve a lot of intellectual
>debates cause I understand quality from the moq. Somehow I have
>been getting people that disagree with each other, to agree with me
>and yet I understand quality and that's why. Yet they are using
>flourishing sometimes, but haven't gone to the depths that the moq
>goes in explaining it. Aristotle talks about flourishing and how it
>is a society and person striving for what is good. He lists in his
>book on ethics what is thriving and what is decay.
>
>Does this help show you where I'm coming from now?
Marsha:
You introduced me to the Platform Sutra and as a vehicle to
Buddhism. Thank you for that.
_____________
"He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
(Friedrich von Schiller)
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list