[MD] The New Socialism - Wired Magazine
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Mon Jun 8 13:09:47 PDT 2009
On 8 Jun 2009 at 9:09, X Acto wrote:
>
>
> Platt:
> Guess you missed the part in Lila where Pirsig talks about socialism
> vs. free markets. He also talks about human rights and why SOM
> intellectuals are incapable of governing properly (they lack morals). I
> could go on. But the most relevant premise of the MOQ supporting
> Nick's thesis is the nature of DQ: "It contains no pattern of fixed rewards
> and punishments. Its only perceived good is freedom and its only
> perceived evil is static quality itself-any pattern of one-sided fixed
> values that tries to contain and kill the ongoing free force of life." (Lila,
> 9)
>
> Ron:
> And Platt, you know WHY those intellectuals are imoral? because they thought of
> themselves as individuals, they valued their individual biological desires over social
> quality. Like greed and hedonism. Gomorrah my freind.
Where did you ever get that idea? Did you just make it up?
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list