[MD] epistemological first musings and poetry's recognition

[MarshaV]

Ian,

Just did a search on a few terms in the archives, didn't get any 
matches.  What terms were matching on, or were you expanding on what 
was read between the lines.


Marsha



At 09:26 AM 6/9/2009, you wrote:
>Actually Bo is not correct .... I was just counting up all the
>references to MoQ and the patterns / levels in the threads initiated
>by Nick in the past week. Dozens of them - just not in the mail
>headers ;-)
>
>But I have already expressed my agreement with you to Nick - the onus
>is on him to make the connections.
>
>Ian
>
>On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:21 PM, MarshaV<marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > Bo is correct, the track is Quality and the MOQ, so how is this relevant?
> >  It may be, but at the moment the connection is not obvious to me.
> >
> >
> > Marsha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 08:17 AM 6/9/2009, you wrote:
> >>
> >> Ian:
> >> > Lilburne's first post was only 3 days ago. What makes you recommend it ?
> >>
> >> Nick:
> >> The quality of his post.  He introduced it in another forum.  He seems to
> >> be
> >> brilliant on the topic.
> >> He's been studying this for awhile and therefore isn't blogging on a whim
> >> on
> >> these topics.  He's put a lot of reading and effort into what he knows for
> >> a
> >> long time now from what I gather discussing with him.  So he's blogging
> >> this
> >> information after a great length of study.
> >>
> >> Here's a quote of Lilburne's perspective and his explanation of what he
> >> plans on
> >> doing first the other "person's post" and then Lilburne's response:
> >>
> >> Person's Post:
> >>
> >> "that's interesting, how did both David Hume and Aritotle influence you?
> >> I would think they would both be jarring to the mind if they were both
> >> believed mainly because hume was such a radical a posteriorist as opposed
> >> to aristotle's apriorism."
> >>
> >> Lilburne response:
> >>
> >> "I'm going to go into that in detail when my history of epistemology
> >> series
> >> of posts reaches Aristotle and Hume.  But, basically I'm influenced by
> >> Hume's
> >> philosophy of mind and Aristotle's basic teleological analysis of human
> >> nature,
> >> his taxonomy of concepts, and the application of his formal logic to
> >> economics.
> >> I'll try to square that circle in my blog.  Also, I believe Aristotle is
> >> not nearly as
> >> a prioristic as he is often characterized, and that Hume's a posteriorism
> >> is not
> >> as crude as many think.  Aristotle was no Cartesian rationalist, and Hume
> >> was no Schmollerite/positivist."
> >>
> >> I would definitely read all his posts from the beginning.  They are each
> >> very, very
> >> short considering the topic, but he is concise and thorough enough that a
> >> clear
> >> understanding can be surmise in my opinion.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Nick
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Be Yourself @ mail.com!
> >> Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
> >> Get a Free Account at www.mail.com
> >>
> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> Archives:
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> >
> > _____________
> >
> > "He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
> >  (Friedrich von Schiller)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


_____________

"He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
   (Friedrich von Schiller)