[MD] epistemological first musings and poetry's recognition

[MarshaV]

Ian,

You are correct, I wasn't sorting properly.


Marsha




At 09:52 AM 6/9/2009, you wrote:
>All I can say Marsha is that the term MoQ appears in the text of mails
>from Nick, Gav, You, Dave, Me and the words level, pattern, social,
>intellectual etc ... also several times all in the current threads.
>
>But no big deal ...
>
>Ian
>
>On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:32 PM, MarshaV<marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
> >
> > Ian,
> >
> > Just did a search on a few terms in the archives, didn't get any matches.
> >  What terms were matching on, or were you expanding on what was 
> read between
> > the lines.
> >
> >
> > Marsha
> >
> >
> >
> > At 09:26 AM 6/9/2009, you wrote:
> >>
> >> Actually Bo is not correct .... I was just counting up all the
> >> references to MoQ and the patterns / levels in the threads initiated
> >> by Nick in the past week. Dozens of them - just not in the mail
> >> headers ;-)
> >>
> >> But I have already expressed my agreement with you to Nick - the onus
> >> is on him to make the connections.
> >>
> >> Ian
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:21 PM, MarshaV<marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Nick,
> >> >
> >> > Bo is correct, the track is Quality and the MOQ, so how is this
> >> > relevant?
> >> >  It may be, but at the moment the connection is not obvious to me.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Marsha
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > At 08:17 AM 6/9/2009, you wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Ian:
> >> >> > Lilburne's first post was only 3 days ago. What makes you recommend
> >> >> > it ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Nick:
> >> >> The quality of his post.  He introduced it in another forum.  He seems
> >> >> to
> >> >> be
> >> >> brilliant on the topic.
> >> >> He's been studying this for awhile and therefore isn't blogging on a
> >> >> whim
> >> >> on
> >> >> these topics.  He's put a lot of reading and effort into what he knows
> >> >> for
> >> >> a
> >> >> long time now from what I gather discussing with him.  So he's blogging
> >> >> this
> >> >> information after a great length of study.
> >> >>
> >> >> Here's a quote of Lilburne's perspective and his explanation of what he
> >> >> plans on
> >> >> doing first the other "person's post" and then Lilburne's response:
> >> >>
> >> >> Person's Post:
> >> >>
> >> >> "that's interesting, how did both David Hume and Aritotle influence
> >> >> you?
> >> >> I would think they would both be jarring to the mind if they were both
> >> >> believed mainly because hume was such a radical a posteriorist as
> >> >> opposed
> >> >> to aristotle's apriorism."
> >> >>
> >> >> Lilburne response:
> >> >>
> >> >> "I'm going to go into that in detail when my history of epistemology
> >> >> series
> >> >> of posts reaches Aristotle and Hume.  But, basically I'm influenced by
> >> >> Hume's
> >> >> philosophy of mind and Aristotle's basic teleological analysis of human
> >> >> nature,
> >> >> his taxonomy of concepts, and the application of his formal logic to
> >> >> economics.
> >> >> I'll try to square that circle in my blog.  Also, I believe Aristotle
> >> >> is
> >> >> not nearly as
> >> >> a prioristic as he is often characterized, and that Hume's a
> >> >> posteriorism
> >> >> is not
> >> >> as crude as many think.  Aristotle was no Cartesian rationalist, and
> >> >> Hume
> >> >> was no Schmollerite/positivist."
> >> >>
> >> >> I would definitely read all his posts from the beginning.  They are
> >> >> each
> >> >> very, very
> >> >> short considering the topic, but he is concise and thorough enough that
> >> >> a
> >> >> clear
> >> >> understanding can be surmise in my opinion.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Nick
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Be Yourself @ mail.com!
> >> >> Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
> >> >> Get a Free Account at www.mail.com
> >> >>
> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> >> Archives:
> >> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _____________
> >> >
> >> > "He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
> >> >  (Friedrich von Schiller)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> > Archives:
> >> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >> >
> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> Archives:
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> >
> > _____________
> >
> > "He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
> >  (Friedrich von Schiller)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


_____________

"He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
   (Friedrich von Schiller)