[MD] Reductionism

[MarshaV]

At 05:17 PM 6/10/2009, you wrote:
>At 05:01 PM 6/10/2009, you wrote:
>>No marsha, you used the word "both" - if you could tell me how a
>>"combination" is different than a "both"  perhaps I'd see your point.  As it
>>is, I don't.
>
>John,
>
>I decided to use _both_ words because see them as mutually 
>dependent.  It is my understanding of the Buddhist concept of the 
>Two Truths doctrine.  It's too complicated for my little mind to 
>explain without making a mess of it, so look it up in Wikipedia.

John,

It is also my understand of the MOQ that from Quality subject and 
object are created as mutually dependent.


Marsha






>Marsha
>
>
>
>>On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:47 PM, MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
>>
>>I did not use the word 'combination', so what are you talking about?   It
>> > sounds like so much blah, blah, blah...
>>
>>
>>I don't believe it sounds like blah blah blah.  In  fact, I can easily prove
>>the difference between blah, blah, blah and what I said earlier.
>>
>>blah,blah,blah...
>
>.
>_____________
>
>The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a 
>reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
>.
>.
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


_____________

"He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
   (Friedrich von Schiller)