[MD] Reductionism

[plattholden at gmail.com]

Marsha,

Right. That's my understanding, also. The evidence is seen in an 
oscilloscope, cloud chamber, photographic plate and/or other man-made 
particle detector instrument, never directly. 




On 22 Jun 2009 at 13:59, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> Platt,
> 
> I'm really a dummy about this stuff, but it is my understanding that 
> there is no particle seen, but only evidence from the event, for 
> instance on a photographic plate, tracks in a cloud or bubble chamber, etc.
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 01:37 PM 6/22/2009, you wrote:
> >Marsha,
> >
> >When a particle suddenly for no good reason appears on an
> >oscilloscope and then disappears.
> >
> >Platt
> >
> >
> >
> >On 22 Jun 2009 at 13:22, MarshaV wrote:
> >
> > > At 12:23 PM 6/22/2009, you wrote:
> > > >Hi Andre,
> > > >
> > > >Agree. Quantum responses are the same as DQ responses only at a 
> > lower level
> > > >than you and I experience DQ responses are instantaneous, reverberating
> > > >throughout the cosmos, and all emerge from the creative energy of DQ.
> > >
> > >
> > > Gee Platt, would you please explain a Quantum response?
> > >
> > >
> > > Marsha
> > >
> > >
> > > >Usually, static patterns manage to deflect DQ. But every once in 
> > awhile, DQ
> > > >breaks through, showing itself in what we regard as lucky
> > > >coincidences, called "oops" because SOM science is completely baffled by
> > > >their occurrence
> > > >
> > > >Platt
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Andre Broersen
> > > ><andrebroersen at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Whilst still on the recovery trail I was wondering: what is the
> > > > > relationship
> > > > > between the quantum level and DQ?
> > > > >
> > > > > If quantum forces are said to 'respond' to DQ along the 
> > mathematical laws
> > > > > laid down by quantum physics and if it can be argued further 
> > that all is
> > > > > 'made up' of quantum forces then it follows that we, as with 
> > the universe,
> > > > > respond to DQ instantaneously.( shooting 'through the levels' 
> > if you like
> > > > > with 'their' associated response mechanisms) To wit, I do not 
> > experience
> > > > > something first in my little finger, then in my brain, then in my right
> > > > > foot
> > > > > etc etc. I would have thought it is an instantaneous quality response
> > > > > reverberating through me and the universe..
> > > > >
> > > > > Or am I way, way of here ( if I am I can always blame the remnant
> > > > > side-effects of my medication)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Peace and regards
> > > > > Andre