[MD] MOQ and SOM

[plattholden at gmail.com]

As long as you think Pirsig is correct about ultimate reality, your writing  
MOQ writing? Otherwise, it's SOM writing? Is that the difference?

Platt

On 22 Jun 2009 at 19:56, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> [Platt]  
> >  Pirisg's explication of the MOQ is written in SOM. 
> 
> [Craig, previously] 
> > If you're referring to "Lila", you're way off.  It is the best example of MoQ writing. 
> 
> 
> [Platt] 
> >   Throughout Lila, the author (subject) talks about Lila, (object), Rigel (object) 
> > the Giant (object), good dogs (objects) and many other things and events (objects). 
> 
> 
> True enough.  If Pirsig had said these subjects & objects were the ultimate reality, 
> 
> it would have been SOM writing.  But as he made it clear, that QUALITY is the ultimate reality, 
> 
> it is MoQ writing.  
> Basic MoQ. 
> 
> Craig
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/