[MD] MOQ and SOM

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Mon Jun 22 23:44:17 PDT 2009



"The Tao is called the Great Mother:
empty yet inexhaustible,
it gives birth to infinite worlds."



At 03:11 AM 6/23/2009, you wrote:

>Craig and Platt --
>
>
>[Platt]:
>>Pirisg's explication of the MOQ is written in SOM.
>
>[Craig]:
>>True enough. If Pirsig had said these subjects & objects were
>>the ultimate reality, it would have been SOM writing.
>>But as he made it clear, that QUALITY is the ultimate reality,
>>it is MoQ writing.
>>Basic MoQ.
>
>We all live, speak and write in an S/O reality.  Yet, as Craig 
>notes, Pirsig posits (theorizes) a QUALITY (DQ?) reality.  As the 
>author of Essentialism, I posit an ESSENCE reality.  Does this mean 
>that, except for the names of our respective realities, Pirsig and I 
>have an absolute or ultimate reality in common?
>
>How do Pirsigians feel about this?  Or do they not regard 
>undifferentiated Quality as their primary Reality?
>
>Just curious,
>Ham
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


_____________

"He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
   (Friedrich von Schiller)



   




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list