[MD] MOQ and SOM
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Mon Jun 22 23:44:17 PDT 2009
"The Tao is called the Great Mother:
empty yet inexhaustible,
it gives birth to infinite worlds."
At 03:11 AM 6/23/2009, you wrote:
>Craig and Platt --
>
>
>[Platt]:
>>Pirisg's explication of the MOQ is written in SOM.
>
>[Craig]:
>>True enough. If Pirsig had said these subjects & objects were
>>the ultimate reality, it would have been SOM writing.
>>But as he made it clear, that QUALITY is the ultimate reality,
>>it is MoQ writing.
>>Basic MoQ.
>
>We all live, speak and write in an S/O reality. Yet, as Craig
>notes, Pirsig posits (theorizes) a QUALITY (DQ?) reality. As the
>author of Essentialism, I posit an ESSENCE reality. Does this mean
>that, except for the names of our respective realities, Pirsig and I
>have an absolute or ultimate reality in common?
>
>How do Pirsigians feel about this? Or do they not regard
>undifferentiated Quality as their primary Reality?
>
>Just curious,
>Ham
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
_____________
"He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
(Friedrich von Schiller)
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list