[MD] MOQ and SOM

[plattholden at gmail.com]

Hi Joe,

Your statement arises from SOM stance where a subject beholds an 
object such as the formula you cite. From an MOQ stance, Beauty 
(Quality) uses our eyes to see with.  As Pirsig said, "It isn't Lila that has 
quality; it's Quality that has Lila."

Platt



On 25 Jun 2009 at 16:21, Joseph Maurer wrote:

> Hi Platt,
> 
> Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A2+B2=C2.  Absolutely beautiful!
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/24/09 6:16 AM, "Platt Holden" <plattholden at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Not only where did the beauty go, but where did the beauty come from? As
> > usual, science has no answer nor any capability of discovering an answer.
> > Something besides quarks, leptons and bosons is going on. I nominate the
> > creative force of DQ.
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:54 PM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Masanobu's refutation of Reductionism:
> >> Science taking Nature apart to try and understand it is like a Dr.
> >> analyzing
> >> the beauty of a woman by dissecting her.  Where did the beauty go?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ------------
> >> Doing Good IS Being
> >> ------------
> >>  Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> Archives:
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >> 
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/