[MD] MOQ and SOM

[John Carl]

Error is not exactly what you get with dividing by zero.  That's only on a
computer cuz computer's can't handle deep truth.  "Infinity" is just as
valid an answer, as is "Mu".
J Carl


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Joseph Maurer <jhmau at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Hi Platt,
>
> I am sorry that you do not value the tremendous contributions mathematical
> logic has made to our present description of reality.  In ordinary
> mathematics when you divide a number by 0 logic is destroyed and you get an
> error message.
>
> Imho Pirsig made more apparent this error in a metaphysics for mathematical
> logic and proposed that 0, DQ, remain undefined.  By leaving 0 DQ undefined
> in terms of 1, then division by DQ becomes the basis for a logical
> metaphysics, evolution. MOQ adds this element to mathematical logic.  MOQ
> is
> a real metaphysics, instead of the metaphysics of descriptive logic SOM
> where division by 0 leads to error.  Lila is DQ/SQ.
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 6/25/09 4:44 PM, "plattholden at gmail.com" <plattholden at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > Your statement arises from SOM stance where a subject beholds an
> > object such as the formula you cite. From an MOQ stance, Beauty
> > (Quality) uses our eyes to see with.  As Pirsig said, "It isn't Lila that
> has
> > quality; it's Quality that has Lila."
> >
> > Platt
> >
> >
> >
> > On 25 Jun 2009 at 16:21, Joseph Maurer wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Platt,
> >>
> >> Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A2+B2=C2.  Absolutely beautiful!
> >>
> >> Joe
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/24/09 6:16 AM, "Platt Holden" <plattholden at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Not only where did the beauty go, but where did the beauty come from?
> As
> >>> usual, science has no answer nor any capability of discovering an
> answer.
> >>> Something besides quarks, leptons and bosons is going on. I nominate
> the
> >>> creative force of DQ.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:54 PM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Masanobu's refutation of Reductionism:
> >>>> Science taking Nature apart to try and understand it is like a Dr.
> >>>> analyzing
> >>>> the beauty of a woman by dissecting her.  Where did the beauty go?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ------------
> >>>> Doing Good IS Being
> >>>> ------------
> >>>>  Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >>>> Archives:
> >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >>>>
> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >>> Archives:
> >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >>
> >>
> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >> Archives:
> >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>



-- 
------------
Doing Good IS Being
------------