[MD] The Quality/MOQ dichotomy.

[Joseph Maurer]

On Sunday 2 March 2009 Krimel writes to Ron:

<snip>
> As I have said many times Quality is undefined because like James
> says it is ever changing, continuous, flowing and uncertain. But
> our descriptions of it as static or dynamic are not similarly
> required to be undefined or indefinable. All experience gets
> rendered into concepts. If it didn't we couldn't talk about it at
> all. The issue is always a matter of how closely we can formulate
> conceptual illusions that approximate our lived experience.
 
Hi Krimel, Ron, and all,

Esoteric literature suggests any manifestation conforms to three points of
view:  What it is, what it isn¹t, what keeps it going. A law of three forces
Active, Passive, Neutral.  Meaning occurs when these three aspects are
conceptualized.  Denial is often presupposed when discussing a familiar
subject.

Joe



> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/