[MD] Quality-as-pre-conceptual/MOQ as conceptual.

[X Acto]

I meant John and Silvia but said Deweese, apologies Bo.




________________________________
From: X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2009 4:07:28 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Quality-as-pre-conceptual/MOQ as conceptual.






Ron:
Why is this so outrageous? in many places in many ways Pirsig hammers this very point home
throughout his work. the biggest gumption trap was the adhereance to one particular method.
Deweese was guilty of this with the parts for his motorcycle, it made him blind to the alternate
possiblities that had more quality, like the beer can shim example. You take the Deweese
track in that you insist on factory certified parts where Pirsig says that there is greater quality
in milling your own.
"The cycle you work on is the cycle of your self"


 
Bo

1 Mar. you came to Ron's rescue after  :

I had said:
> > ...But seriously you may have a point, Pirsig's "obsession" was/is
> > Reality=Quality issue and he obviously thinks that the Q-reality can be
> > "assembled" many ways and still be a Quality Metaphysics. He even says
> > somewhere that SOM is a "moq. This is so outrageous that I hardly
> > believe my eyes. 



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org..uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/