[MD] The Quality/MOQ dichotomy.
Michael Poloukhine
moq at poloukhine.com
Thu Mar 5 06:12:45 PST 2009
> [Krimel]
> The real confusion comes from us over
> analyzing and nit picking.
MP: Man, if that doesn't sum it up I don't know what will.
IMO making the MoQ into an M is the source of all the problems being wrestled
with in the first place. M is SOM; making an *M*oQ in response to a sensing of
Quality is where all this trouble begins. SOM is the problem and trying to
replace it through its own language only transforms the replacement.
Its like jumping into a pigsty to tell people in it they can be clean outside it; the
more you persist at it, the messier you get and the less they believe you.
MP
----
"Don't believe everything you think."
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list