[MD] The Quality/MOQ dichotomy
Andre Broersen
andrebroersen at gmail.com
Fri Mar 6 09:41:25 PST 2009
Hey Andre,
> Dynamic Quality:undifferentiated (unpatterned) aesthetic continuum.
> Static Quality: differentiated, (patterned) aesthetic continuum.
Hadn't seen the Quality division expressed this way before. Well said.
Thanks.
Platt
Andre:
Thanks Platt but please look at some of the questions I have asked related
to this way of putting things. Sometimes I am not aware of the ontological,
epistemological or philosophical/metaphysical spinn-offs of what I am
saying, suggesting or asking.
I am only the son of a former tulip growing farmer (rest his soul).
Why the pre-conceptual/conceptual (among other dualisms)?? Are we not (part
of ) real(ity).
I can fathom 'pre- intellectual' but as soon as the intellectualising starts
to hit 'people' begin to talk about concepts etc.( all SOM to me).
Does this confirm Bodvar's SOL, if so, why the opposition? If not, please
explain?
For what it is worth and thanks again Platt.
Andre
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list