[MD] Faith/Skepticism

X Acto xacto at rocketmail.com
Sat Mar 7 19:42:46 PST 2009






Well that is exactly the case, thats Pirsigs whole arguement.. Reflex equates to Quality,
the response of an organism to it's environment.
Quality is based on reflex, immediate biological reflex. Quality IS self preservational reflex.
More empirical and provable than any objective "truth".Quality is expereince.


Have you read the books.



 

> MP:
> What I can't understand is why it bothers you so much that it takes
> faith to affirm 
> Quality. 
> 
> Ron:
> Because it doesent, It does not require faith to recoil from a hot
> stove. Thats the point.
> you withdraw reflexivly prior to distinctions like faith. 

MP: But this only further disproves your own point: *Reflex* takes you off the 
stove. 

To affirm that this reflex is based on Quality as opposed to simple biological self 
preservation takes faith because you can't *prove* its Quality rather than 
biological self preservational reflex. The latter is the only thing you can actually 
prove, the former is un-provable. You have evidence "for" the latter but only 
evidence "of" the former.

Ron:


      


More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list