[MD] Question?

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Sun Mar 8 06:51:02 PDT 2009


At 09:46 AM 3/8/2009, you wrote:
> > At 08:36 AM 3/8/2009, you wrote:
> > >
> > > > Greetings!
> > > >
> > > > I am wondering what is the relationship between Quantum Theory and
> > > > the Theory of Evolution.  Are they both science?  Is there a
> > > > particular ontological assumption underlying each that is the
> > > > same?  Different?
> > > >
> > > > It would be okay to tell me my questions make no sense whatsoever
> > > > because...
> > >
> > > > Marsha
> > >
> > >Hey Marsha,
> > >
> > >Both quantum theory and evolution depend on the assumption that chance
> > >has creative power. Compare to the MOQ assumption that DQ has creative
> > >power, or to the theist's assumption that God has creative power.
> > >
> > >Platt
> >
> > Hi Platt,
> >
> > Hmmmm.  Quantum Theory is based on chance?  I thought it acknowledged
> > uncertainty, but chance?  By chance do you mean a dynamic spontaneity?
> >
> > I think I am going to totally confuse myself so any help will be
> > appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > Marsha
>
>Hi Marsha
>
>Yes. Dynamic spontaneity describes the unpredictable appearance of a
>quantum particle from the quantum soup. Also described by "Oops." I'm sure
>Kremel can explain the details if you are interested, something about
>probability functions.
>
>Platt

Hello Platt,

But can Krimel explain with certainty?  I'm thinking I should drop 
this topic because I am way beyond...


Marsha





.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
. 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list