[MD] Question?

[X Acto]

Platt,
Interesting comment, when I think of chance in this capacity
I think that chance is limited by the form it takes, therefore
it is not totally random per-say but guided on the contigent of the form
it manifests in, the form it manifests in being contingent on limited
possibility of chance.

Physicists have noted how particles oscillate into and out of existence,
anomaloies of a field.

-Ron




________________________________
From: Platt Holden <plattholden at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 8:36:45 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Question?


> Greetings!
> 
> I am wondering what is the relationship between Quantum Theory and 
> the Theory of Evolution.  Are they both science?  Is there a 
> particular ontological assumption underlying each that is the 
> same?  Different?
> 
> It would be okay to tell me my questions make no sense whatsoever
> because...

> Marsha

Hey Marsha,

Both quantum theory and evolution depend on the assumption that chance
has creative power. Compare to the MOQ assumption that DQ has creative 
power, or to the theist's assumption that God has creative power.

Platt




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/