[MD] The Quality/MOQ dichotomy

[skutvik at online.no]

Andre

On 7 March:

DMB had said to Andre:

> > I hope that helps. I really do.

Andre:
> It does dmb and thank you for this. To give Bodvar credit, he is
> certainly committed and has the integrity of the MoQ at heart. And the
> other thing is that he is consistent and has been so over the years. I
> have not the understanding of the MoQ to the extent he suggests he has.
> I really am convinced that before you can play with something you have
> to understand it completely. Once you know this you can become creative
> (and perhaps develop new insights). I am not there yet with regards to
> the MoQ, not by a long shot.Bodvar has to account for these himself. 

You seem torn between DMB and me. Hope you don't develop 
schizo ... something ;-) 

> There are some questions I have put to Bodvar that are still hanging.

Er.... I may have overlooked some posts in the recent flood. What 
were the questions?

> In the mean time, I keep on going over the static MoQ (ZMM, Lila etc,)
> in my attempt to integrate it with my own q experiences and
> reflections. And rest assured, Pirsig (and McWatt) remain the
> authority for me.
 
> The MoQ is a wonderful thing and through this discuss and contributors
> such as yourself, Platt, Bodvar,Ron, Marsha and many others (past and
> present) we will develop the MoQ in the process of living it.

Wish I was as nice and polite as you.  

Bodvar